Allenby, Brad
return to
top
Allenby, B. (2003,
Spring).
Micro and Macro Ethics for an Anthropogenic Earth.
Professional Ethics Report, XVIII(2).
Allenby, B. (2006, June).
No Escape, No Excuses. GreenBiz.com, The Allenby
Column.
Bennett,
Ira
return to top
Bennett, I. & Sarewitz, D. (2005).
Too Little, Too Late?: Research Policies on the Societal Implications of Nanotechnology in the United States.
(Draft)
Bozeman, Barry
return to top
Crow, M.M. & Bozeman, B. (1998).
Limited by Design. New York: Columbia University Press.
Bozeman, B. (2000, September 25).
Booming and Busting at the Same Time: Why States Need Dual Agenda Cooperative Technology Programs.
Summit on Minnesota
Economy, RiverCentre, St. Paul, MN.
(Draft)
Bozeman, B. (2000, August 18).
Public Value Failure: When Efficient Markets May Not Do.
Public Administration Review. (Draft)
Bozeman, B.
(2000).
Technology and Economic Development for Whom?: The Prospects for
“Dual Agenda” State Programs. In A.H. Teich, et al., AAAS
Science and Technology Policy Yearbook 2000 (pp. 175-189).
Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Bozeman B. (2000).
Technology Transfer and Public Policy: A Review of Research and Theory.
Research Policy, 29(2000), 627-655.
Bozeman B., & Sarewitz D. (2002, October 18).
Public Failures in U.S. Science Policy.
(Draft)
Brian, Jennifer
return to top
Brian, J. (2006, February 16-20).
The
importance of trust: Science, policy and the publics. AAAS Annual Meeting, St. Louis, MO.
Brown, Mark
return to top
Brown, Mark. (2004).
Essay Review: The Political Philosophy of Science Policy.
Minerva, 42, 77-95.
Brown, Mark. (2006).
Survey
Article: Citizen Panels and the Concept of Representation. Journal
of Political Philosophy, 14(2), 203-225.
Conz,
Dave
return to top
Conz, D. (2005, October).
Unruly Artifacts and
Controversial Policy: Gun Violence and Gun Control in America 1934-2005.
Society for the Social Studies of Science Conference, Pasadena,
CA.
Corley, Elizabeth
return to top
Corley, E. &
Gaughan, M. (2005).
Scientists'
Participation in University Research Centers: What are the Gender
Differences?
Journal of Technology
Transfer,
30: 371-381.
Crow, Michael
return to top
Crow, M.M. & Bozeman, B. (1998).
Limited by Design. New York: Columbia University Press.
Crow, M.M. &
Tucker, C. (1999, June 1).
The American Research University System as America’s de facto
Technology Policy. (Draft)
Crow, M.M.
None Dare Call it Hubris: The Limits of Knowledge..
Issues in Science and Technology 23, no. 2 (2007): 29-32.
Crow, M.M.
The Challenge for the Obama Administration Science Team.
Issues in Science and Technology 25, no. 3 (2009): 29-30.
CSPO
return to top
CSPO.
Bush
Conference: Science the Endless Frontier 1945-1995. (Highlights
and Transcript)
Foladori, Guillermo
return to top
Sarewitz, D., Foladori, G., Invernizzi, I., & Garfinkel, M. (2004).
Science Policy in Its Social Context.
Philosophy Today,
2004 Supplement, 67-83.
Garfinkel, Michele
return to top
Garfinkel, M. &
Weiss, S.C. (1999).
In the
Court of History, Ehlers v. Bush. Recent Science Newsletter,
1(1) 6-7.
Garfinkel, M. (2001).
Scouting report:
John Marburger. Recent Science Newsletter,
3(1), 5.
Sarewitz, D.,
Foladori, G., Invernizzi, I., & Garfinkel, M. (2004).
Science Policy in Its Social Context.
Philosophy Today,
2004 Supplement, 67-83.
Gaughan, Monica
return to top
Corley, E. &
Gaughan, M. (2005).
Scientists'
Participation in University Research Centers: What are the Gender
Differences?
Journal of Technology
Transfer,
30: 371-381.
Green, Richard
return to top
Green, R. & Lepkowski, W. (2005, July).
Remembering RANN.
CSPO Perspective.
Greenberg, Daniel S.
return to top
Greenberg, D.S. (2004, November).
Where are the
Scientists? CSPO Perspective.
Greenberg, D.S. (2006, May).
Labs in a Bubble.
CSPO Perspective.
Gupta, Aarti
return to top
Juma, C. & Gupta, A.
(1999).
Safe use of biotechnology. Retrieved March 31, 2005 from
International Food Policy Research Institute
Gupta, A. (2000).
Governing Biosafety in India: The Relevance of the Cartagena
Protocol. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs (BCSIA)
Discussion Paper 2000-24. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Gupta, A. (2002).
The Role of Knowledge Flows in Bridging North-South Technical
Divides.
In D. Sarewitz,
et al., Knowledge Flows & Knowledge Collectives:
Understanding the Role of Science & Technology Policies in
Development, 2(1).
Guston, David
return to top
Guston, D. (1996).
Principal-Agent Theory and the Structure of Science Policy.
Science and Public Policy, 23(4), 229-240.
Guston, D. (1998, September 3-6).
Evaluating the First U.S. Consensus Conference: The Impact of the
Citizens’ Panel on Telecommunications and the Future of Democracy. 1998 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association (APSA), Boston, MA.
Guston, D. (1998). Technology Transfer and the Implementation
of CRADAs at the National Institutes of Health. In L.M. Branscom &
J. H. Keller (Eds.),
Investing in Innovation
(pp. 221-249).
Boston, MA: MIT Press.
Guston, D. & Bimber, B. (1998).
Technology Assessment for the New Century. (Draft)
Guston, D. (1999).
Stabilizing the Boundary Between Politics and Science: The Role of
the Office of Technology Transfer as a Boundary Organization.
Social Studies of Science, 29(1), 87-111.
Guston, D. (2000).
Between Politics and Science: Assuring the Productivity and
Integrity of Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Guston, D. (2000).
The Expanding Role of Peer Review Processes in the United States.
Public Research, Innovation, and Technology Policies in the US,
4, 31-48.
Guston, D. (2000).
Retiring the Social Contract for Science. Retrieved March 31,
2005 from Issues in Science and Technology
Guston, D. (2001).
Integrity, Responsibility, and Democracy in Science.
Scipolicy, 1(2), 168-189.
Guston, D. (2001, June 14).
Science and Technology Advice for Congress: Insight from the OTA
Experience. Workshop on
Creating
Institutional Arrangements to Provide Science and Technology Advice
to Congress, Washington, DC.
Guston, D., Woodhouse, E., & Sarewitz, D. (2001).
A
Science and Technology Focus for the Bush Administration. Issues in Science and Technology,
Spring 2001, 1-4.
Guston, D. & Sarewitz, D. (2002).
Real-Time Technology Assessment.
Technology in Society, 24(1-2), 93-109.
Guston, D.
(2004). Forget Politicizing Science. Let’s Democratize Science!
Issues in Science and Technology, Fall 2004, 25-28.
Guston, D. (2005).
Institutional Design for Socially
Robust Knowledge: The National Toxicology Program's Report on
Carcinogens. In Maasen, S. & Weingart, P. (Eds.),
Democratization of Expertise? Exploring Novel Forms of
Scientific Advice in Political Decision-Making - Sociology of the
Sciences, 24 (pp. 63-79). Springer.
Gano, G.L., Crowley, J.E., and Guston, G.H.
(2006, April 26).
"Shielding"
the Knowledge Transfer Process in Human Service Research.
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.
Fenyk, H. & Guston, D. H. (2006).
Citizen Expertise and
Citizen Action in the Creation of the Freshwater Wetlands Protection
Act. In Maher, N. M. (Ed.), New Jersey's Environments:
Past, Present and Future (pp. 68-89). New Brunswick, New
Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
Guston, D.H. (2006).
On Consensus and Voting in
Science: From Asilomar to the National Toxicology Program.
In Frickel, S. & Moore, K. (Eds.), The New Political Sociology of
Science: Institutions, Networks, and Power (pp. 378-404).
Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.
Guston, D.H. (2006, May/June).
Responsible
Knowledge-Based Innovation. Society, 19-21.
Guston, D.H. (2006).
Science Policy: Institutions and
Issues. NSF Workshop on the Social Organization of Science
and Science Policy, July 13-14th, 2006.
Guston,
David; Valdivia, Walter. "Report of the Workshop." Public Value
Mapping Workshop. October 13, 2006.
Hira, Ron
return to top
Hira, R. (2003)
Utilizing
Immigration Regulations as a Competitive Advantage: An Additional
Explanation for India’s Success in Exporting Information Technology
Services. (Draft)
Invernizzi, Noela
return to top
Sarewitz, D., Foladori, G., Invernizzi, I., & Garfinkel, M. (2004).
Science Policy in Its Social Context.
Philosophy Today,
2004 Supplement, 67-83.
Invernizzi, N. (2005).
Science and technology policy in transition: new challenges for Cardoso’s
legacy. Int. J. Technology and Globalisation, 1(2), 162–184.
Lepkowski, Wil
return to top
Lepkowski, W. (2001, December).
The Academies and the World.
CSPO Perspective.
Lepkowski, W. (2001, March).
Boehlert
Ascending. CSPO Perspective.
Lepkowski, W. (2001, October 29).
Has
'Big Money' Corrupted Science? Chemical & Engineering
News, 79(44), 59-60.
Lepkowski, W. (2001, June).
The Mummy
Returns. CSPO Perspectives.
Lepkowski, W. (2001, November).
Sciences Mobilizes. CSPO
Perspective.
Lepkowski, W. (2002, January).
Addition: Academies Detail War
Plan. CSPO Perspective.
Lepkowski, W. (2002, October).
Maize, Genes and Peer Review.
CSPO Perspective.
Green, R. & Lepkowski, W. (2005, July).
Remembering RANN.
CSPO Perspective.
Monahan, Torin
return to top
Monahan, Torin, (2006).
Surveillance and Security: Technological Politics and Power in
Everyday Life
Miller, Clark
return to top
Miller, C. A. (2001, Autumn).
Hybrid
Management: Boundary Organizations, Science Policy, and
Environmental Governance in the Climate Regime.
Science, Technology and Human Values, 26(4), 478-500.
Miller, C. A. (2004, August).
Interrogating the Civic Epistemology of American Democracy:
Stability and Instability in the 2000 US Presidential Election.
Social Studies of Science, 34(4), 501-530.
Miller, C. A. (2006).
The Study Of Public Reasoning.
NSF Workshop on the Social Organization of Science and Science
Policy, July 13-14th, 2006.
Miller, Clark
A. (2007).
"Democratization, International Knowledge Institutions, and Global
Governance."
Governance 2 2: 325-357, 2007.
Pielke, Jr., Roger A.
return to top
Pielke Jr., R.A.,
Klein, R. & Sarewitz, D. (2000).
Turning the Big Knob: An Evaluation of the Use of Energy Policy to
Modulate Future Climate Impacts. Energy and Environment,
11, 255-276.
Pielke Jr., R.A. &
Sarewitz, D. (2002-2003, Winter).
Wanted: Scientific Leadership on Climate.
Issues in Science
and Technology.
Pielke Jr., R.A. (2004, October).
The End of
Research. CSPO Perspectives.
Sarewitz, Daniel
return to top
Sarewitz, D. (1996).
Frontiers of Illusion: Science, Technology, and the Politics of
Progress. Philadelphia: University Temple Press.
Sarewitz, D. (1997). Social
Change and Science Policy. Issues in Science and Technology
Online
Pielke Jr., R.A.,
Klein, R. & Sarewitz, D. (2000).
Turning the Big Knob: An Evaluation of the Use of Energy Policy to
Modulate Future Climate Impacts. Energy and Environment,
11, 255-276.
Sarewitz, D. (2000, August 20-25).
Science Policy Present: Where is the Frontier?
Gordon Research Conference: New Frontiers in Science and Technology Policy,
Plymouth, NH.
Guston, D., Woodhouse, E., & Sarewitz, D. (2001).
A
Science and Technology Focus for the Bush Administration. Issues in Science and Technology,
Spring 2001, 1-4.
Sarewitz, D. (2001).
Politics is Hell.
Science, 294(5541), 311-312.
Bozeman B., & Sarewitz D. (2002, October 18).
Public Failures in U.S. Science Policy.
(Draft)
Guston, D. & Sarewitz, D. (2002).
Real-Time Technology Assessment.
Technology in Society, 24(1-2), 93-109.
Pielke Jr., R.A. &
Sarewitz, D. (2002-2003, Winter).
Wanted: Scientific Leadership on Climate.
Issues in Science
and Technology.
Lightman, A., Sarewitz, D. and Desser, C (Eds.).
(2003).
Living with
the Genie: Essays on Technology and the Quest for Human Mastery.
Washington, DC: Island Press.
Sarewitz, D. (2003, April 8). Does
Science Policy Exist, and If So, Does it Matter?: Some Observations
on the U.S. R&D Budget.
Earth Institute Science, Technology and Global Development Seminar.
Sarewitz, D. (2003, September 8).
Scientizing
the Soul: Research as a Substitute for Moral Discourse in Modern
Society. BA Festival of Science, Salford, UK.
Sarewitz, D. (2004, May 23).
Hiding Behind
Science. Newsday.com.
Sarewitz, D. (2004, October 25).
Stepping
Out of Line in Stem Cell Research; Proposition 71 would cut the
link between science and democracy. Los Angeles Times,
p. B11.
Sarewitz, D., Foladori, G., Invernizzi, I., & Garfinkel, M. (2004).
Science Policy in Its Social Context.
Philosophy Today,
2004 Supplement, 67-83.
Bennett, I. & Sarewitz, D. (2005).
Too Little, Too Late?: Research Policies on the Societal Implications of Nanotechnology in the United States.
(Draft)
Sarewitz, D. (2005).
Scientizing
Politics [Review of the book The Republican War on Science]
Issues in Science and Technology, Winter 2006.
Sarewitz, D. (2005, October 15).
Where Responsibility Lies: Promise versus Process in the Production
of Knowledge for Leading Technologies.
Thinking With
Einstein: The Responsibility of Science for Peace in the 21st
Century, Forum 3: The Challenges Posed to Society by the Leading
Technologies, Berlin, Germany.
Sarewitz, D. (2006, March-April).
Liberating Science from Politics. American Scientist,
94(2), 104.
Sarewitz, D. (2006, February 17).
Proposition 71: Vulgar Democracy in Action. AAAS Annual
Meeting, Symposium on Stems Cells and Society: Assessing a Grand
Challenge.
Sarewitz, D. (2006).
Institutional Ecology and Societal
Outcomes. NSF Workshop on the Social Organization of Science and Science
Policy, July 13-14th, 2006.
Sarewitz, D. (2006).
Public Science and Social
Responsibilities. Development, 2006,
00, (1-5). Society for International Development.
Sarewitz, D. and Karas, T.H. (2006)
Workshop
Report: Policy Implications of Technologies for Cognitive
Enhancement. Workshop held at Arizona State University, May 3-5,
2006, sponsored by the Consortium for Science, Policy and Outcomes
at Arizona State University and the Advanced Concepts Group at
Sandia National Laboratories.
Tennekes, Hendrick
return to top
Tennekes, H. (2006,
February).
Hermetic Jargon.
CSPO Perspectives.
Wetmore, Jameson
return to top
Wetmore, J.M. (2006).
Distributing
Risks and Responsibilities: Flood Hazard Mitigation in New Orleans.
Submitted to Social Studies of Science for its upcoming
special issue: "Things Fall Apart: Comments on Hurricane Katrina."
Wolbring, Gregor
return to top
Wolbring, G. (2004).
Disabled people,
science and technology and health research. In Matlin, S.
(Ed.) Global Forum Update on Research for Health 2005 (pp.
138-141). London, England: Pro-Book.
Wolbring, G. (2006).
The unenhanced
underclass. In Miller, P. and Wilsdon, J. Building
everyday democracy, 122-128. London: Demos.
Woodhouse, Edward
return to top
Woodhouse, E. (2005, September).
Nanotechnology Under Democratic Control?
CSPO Perspective.
Zachary, G. Pascal
return to top
Zachary, G.P. (2005,
January).
Nuclear
Resurgence, Part I. CSPO Perspective.
Zachary, G.P. (2005, April).
Nuclear
Resurgence, Part II. CSPO Perspectives.
