Brian, Jennifer
return to top
Herder, M. & Brian, J. (2006,
February 16-20).
In Stem Cell
Research We Trust?
AAAS Annual Meeting, St. Louis, MO.
Foladori, Guillermo
return to top
Foladori, G. (2003).
Can PPPs on Health Cope With Social Needs? In D. Sarewitz, et
al., Knowledge Flows,1(3).
Foladori, G. & Tommasino, H. (2004).
Globalized Virus Infections: The Case of Foot-and-Mouth Disease in Uruguay.
Latin American Perspectives, 31(6), 96-106.
Foladori, G. (2005).
The Challenge
of Infectious Diseases to the Biomedical Paradigm.
Bulletin of Science, Technology &
Society, 25(2), 145-158.
Garfinkel, Michele
return to top
Chapman, A.R.,
Frankel, M.S. & Garfinkel, M.S. (2000).
Stem Cell Research and Applications: Monitoring the Frontiers of
Biomedical Research. In A.H. Teich, et al., AAAS Science and
Technology Policy Yearbook 2000 (pp. 405-416). Washington, DC:
American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Garfinkel, M.
(2000).
Biomedical Gerrymandering.
Recent Science Newsletter,
2(2), 4-7.
Garfinkel, M.
(2000). High
Stakes in Stem Cell Research. Cerebrum, 2(3), 97-112.
Garfinkel, M.S.,
Sarewitz, D. & Porter, A.L. (2006, March).
A Societal
Outcomes Map for Health Research and Policy. American
Journal of Public Health,
96(3), 441-446. For copies of
article reprints, please contact michele.garfinkel@gmail.com
Gaughan, Monica
return to top
Gaughan, Monica.
Public Value Mapping Breast Cancer Case Studies. In D. Sarewitz,
et al., Knowledge Flows & Knowledge Collectives:
Understanding the Role of Science & Technology Policies in
Development,
2(2).
Lepkowski, Wil
return to top
Lepkowski, W. (2001, August).
Truth in
Doubling. CSPO Perspective.
Lepkowski, W. (2001, September).
Truth in
Doubling II: Kenneth Shine Assesses NIH's Budget Bonanza.
CSPO Perspective.
Lepkowski, W. (2003, March).
Science: Up Close and Personal.
CSPO Perspective.
Porter, Alan
return to top
Garfinkel, M.S.,
Sarewitz, D. & Porter, A.L. (2006, March).
A Societal
Outcomes Map for Health Research and Policy. American
Journal of Public Health,
96(3), 441-446. For copies of article reprints, please contact
michele.garfinkel@gmail.com
Sarewitz, Daniel
return to top
Sarewitz, D. (2000, October).
Review: Death
Takes No Holiday. Journal of Health Politics, Policy,
and Law, 25(5), 988-991.
Sarewitz, D. (2004, October 25).
Stepping
Out of Line in Stem Cell Research; Proposition 71 would cut the
link between science and democracy. Los Angeles Times,
p. B11.
Sarewitz, D. (2005, August 9).
Will human enhancement make us better?. Los Angeles Times.
Garfinkel, M.S.,
Sarewitz, D. & Porter, A.L. (2006, March).
A Societal
Outcomes Map for Health Research and Policy. American
Journal of Public Health,
96(3), 441-446. For copies of article reprints, please contact
michele.garfinkel@gmail.com
Sarewitz, D. (2006, February 17).
Proposition 71: Vulgar Democracy in Action. AAAS Annual
Meeting, Symposium on Stems Cells and Society: Assessing a Grand
Challenge.
Sarewitz, D. and Karas, T.H. (2006)
Workshop
Report: Policy Implications of Technologies for Cognitive
Enhancement. Workshop held at Arizona State University, May 3-5,
2006, sponsored by the Consortium for Science, Policy and Outcomes
at Arizona State University and the Advanced Concepts Group at
Sandia National Laboratories.
Wolbring, Gregor
return to top
Theme C Panel. (2002).
Improving Human Health and Physical Capabilities Theme C Summary.
In Roco, M.C. and Bainbridge, W.S. Converging Technologies for
Improving Human Performance: Nanotechnology, Biotechnology,
Information Technology and Cognitive Science (pp. 179-183).
Arlington, Virginia: NSF/DOC - sponsored report.
Wolbring, G. (2002).
Improving Quality of Life of Disabled People Using Converging
Technologies. In Roco, M.C. and Bainbridge, W.S.
Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance:
Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive
Science (pp. 270-273). Arlington, Virginia: NSF/DOC -
sponsored report.
Wolbring, G. (2002).
Science and Technology and the Triple D (Disease, Disability,
Defect). In Roco, M.C. and Bainbridge, W.S. Converging
Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotechnology,
Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science (pp.
232-
243). Arlington, Virginia: NSF/DOC - sponsored report.
Wolbring, G. (2004).
Disabled people,
science and technology and health research. In Matlin, S.
(Ed.) Global Forum Update on Research for Health 2005 (pp.
138-141). London, England: Pro-Book.
Wolbring, G. (2004).
Solutions follow perception: NBIC and the concept of health,
medicine, disability and disease. Alberta Health Law Review,
12(3).
Wolbring, G.
(2005, December).
The Triangle of Enhancement Medicine, Disabled People, and the Concept
of Health: A New Challenge for HTA, Health Research, and Health Policy.
Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Initiaive #23.
Edmonton, Alberta: Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research.
Wolbring, G. (2006).
The
Enhancement Debate: Able-ism Leads to Transhumanism. James
Martin Institute World Forum on Science and Civilization:
"Tomorrow's People:
The
challenges of technologies for life extension and enhancement,"
University of Oxford.
Wolbring, G. (2006).
The unenhanced
underclass. In Miller, P. and Wilsdon, J. Building
everyday democracy, 122-128. London: Demos.
