Index by Research Themes

Science, Technology, and Social Change

Allenby, Brad

return to top

 

Allenby, B.  (2006, March).  Information Reality.  GreenBiz.com, The Allenby Column.

 

Allenby, B.  (2006, June).  No Escape, No Excuses.  GreenBiz.com, The Allenby Column.

 

Allenby, B.  (2006, July).  Reinventing the Enlightenment.  GreenBiz.com, The Allenby Column.

 

Allenby, B.  (2005, November).  High Technology Military Dominance: The Opiate of Modern Empire.  CSPO Perspective.

 

Bozeman, Barry
return to top
 

Bozeman, B. (2000, September 25). Booming and Busting at the Same Time: Why States Need Dual Agenda Cooperative Technology Programs. Summit on Minnesota Economy, RiverCentre, St. Paul, MN. (Draft)

 

Bozeman, B. (2000, Winter). Expanding the Mission of State Economic Development. Issues in Science and Technology Online.

 

Bozeman, B. (2000, August 18). Public Value Failure: When Efficient Markets May Not DoDo. Public Administration Review. (Draft)
 

Bozeman, B.  (2000).  Technology and Economic Development for Whom?: The Prospects for “Dual Agenda” State Programs.  In A.H. Teich, et al., AAAS Science and Technology Policy Yearbook 2000 (pp. 175-189).  Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

 

Bozeman B., & Sarewitz D. (2002, October 18). Public Failures in U.S. Science Policy. (Draft)

 

Bozeman, B. (2003). Public Value Mapping of Science Outcomes: Theory and Method. In D. Sarewitz, et al., Knowledge Flows & Knowledge Collectives: Understanding the Role of Science & Technology Policies in Development, 2(1).

 

Corley, Elizabeth

return to top

 

Corley, E. & Gaughan, M. (2005). Scientists' Participation in University Research Centers: What are the Gender Differences? Journal of Technology Transfer, 30: 371-381.
            
Crow, Michael
return to top
 

Crow, M.M.  (1999).  The Limit of Us.  Columbia University's State of the Planet Workshop, NY.  (Real Audio).

 

Crow, M.M.  (2000, April 12).  Linking Scientific Research to Societal Outcomes.  AAAS Colloquium on Science and Technology Policy, Washington, DC.

 

Crow, M.M.  (2000).  Linking Scientific Research to Societal Outcomes.  In Teich, A.H., et al., AAAS Science and Technology Policy Yearbook 2001 (pp. 129-131).  Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Crow, M.M. & Sarewitz, D.  (2001).  Nanotechnology and Societal Transformation.  In A.H. Teich, et al., AAAS Science and Technology Policy Yearbook 2001 (pp. 89-101).  Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

 

Crow, M.M.  (2006, February).  The Limits of Us: Producers of the Knowledge that Shapes the State of the Planet.  Submitted to Issues in Science and Technology.

 

Crow, M.M. None Dare Call it Hubris: The Limits of Knowledge.. Issues in Science and Technology 23, no. 2 (2007): 29-32.

 

Erickson, Shelley
return to top

 

Erickson, S.  (2005, October).  'Can I Get Your Email?': Gender, Social Capital and Networking among Engineering Undergraduates.  Society for the Social Studies of Science Conference, Pasadena, CA.

                       
Finneran, Kevin
return to top

 

Finneran, K.  (2006, June).  Neuroethics: New Science, Old Hubris.  CSPO Perspective.

 

Foladori, Guillermo
return to top
 

Foladori, G. (2002). Avances y limites de la sustentabilidad social. Economia, Sociedad y Territorio, 3(12), 621-637.

 

Foladori, G. & Invernizzi, N. (2005). Cuando los Gnomos vienen marchando.  Implicaciones de la Bionanotecnologia.  Theomai, 12.

 

Foladori, G., & Invernizzi, N. (2005). Nanotecnologia: beneficio para todos o mayor desigualdad? (Spanish)

 

Invernizzi, N., Foladori, G., & Guivant, J. (2005). Nanotecnologia e Sociedade. (Portuguese)

 

Foladori, G., & Invernizzi, N. (2005).  Nanotechnology in its Socio-economic Context.  Science Studies, 18(2), 67-73.

       
Garfinkel, Michele
return to top

Garfinkel, M.S., Sarewitz, D. & Porter, A.L.   (2006, March).  A Societal Outcomes Map for Health Research and Policy.  American Journal of Public Health, 96(3), 441-446.

 

Gaughan, Monica
return to top

Corley, E. & Gaughan, M. (2005). Scientists' Participation in University Research Centers: What are the Gender Differences? Journal of Technology Transfer, 30: 371-381.

 

Gaughan, Monica.  Public Value Mapping Breast Cancer Case Studies. In D. Sarewitz, et al., Knowledge Flows & Knowledge Collectives: Understanding the Role of Science & Technology Policies in Development, 2(2).

Gupta, Aarti

return to top

 

Gupta, A. (2002). Public Value Mapping in a Developing Country Context. In D. Sarewitz, et al., Knowledge Flows & Knowledge Collectives: Understanding the Role of Science & Technology Policies in Development, 2(1).

 

Guston, David
return to top
 

Guston, D. & Sarewitz, D. (2002). Real-Time Technology Assessment. Technology in Society, 24(1-2), 93-109.

  
Hira, Ron
return to top
 

Hira, R. (2002). Boom-Bust Cycles: A New Paradigm for Electrical Engineering Employment. (Draft)

 

Hira, R. (2003, June 18). Global Outsourcing of Engineering: Recent Trends and Possible Implications. Testimony to the Committee on Small Business, United States House of Representatives.

 

Hira, R. (2003, June 11). The Globalization of the Information Technology Workforce: Policy Implications. Presented at Breakfast Bytes, Council on Competitiveness.

 

Hira, R. (2003, May 9). Offshore Outsourcing of Engineering: Implications for Innovation Policy.  Presented to Carnegie Mellon University's Engineering and Public Policy Program.

 

Invernizzi, Noela

return to top

 

Foladori, G. & Invernizzi, N. (2005). Cuando los Gnomos vienen marchando.  Implicaciones de la Bionanotecnologia.  Theomai, 12.

 

Foladori, G., & Invernizzi, N. (2005). Nanotecnologia: beneficio para todos o mayor desigualdad? (Spanish)

 

Invernizzi, N., Foladori, G., & Guivant, J. (2005). Nanotecnologia e Sociedade (Portuguese)

 

Foladori, G., & Invernizzi, N. (2005).  Nanotechnology in its Socio-economic Context.  Science Studies, 18(2), 67-73.

 

Lepkowski, Wil
return to top

 

Lepkowski, W.  (2001, January).  Jefferson Rides Again.  CSPO Perspective.

 

Lepkowski, W.  (2001, February).  Science and Engineering Indicators--Of What?  CSPO Perspective.

 

Lepkowski, W.  (2002, April).  Genies Galore.  CSPO Perspective.

 

Lepkowski, W.  (2003, June).  The Once and Future Lab.  CSPO Perspective.

 

Monahan, Torin
return to top

Monahan, Torin. (2004). Just Another Tool? IT Pedagogy and the Commodification of Education. The Urban Review 36(4), 271-292.

 

Monahan, Torin.  (2005, October).  Techno-logics of Residential Surveillance.  Societies for Social Studies of Science Conference, Pasadena, CA.

 

Monahan, Torin, (2006).  Surveillance and Security:  Technological Politics and Power in Everyday Life

 

Murray, Jennifer
return to top

 

Murray, J.  (2005, October).  (ICT) Surveillance and Identity Management of Lesbians in the Workplace.  Society for the Social Studies of Science Conference, Pasadena, CA.

            
Pielke, Jr., Roger A.
return to top
 

Sarewitz, D. & Pielke Jr., R.A. (2005). The Neglected Heart of Science Policy: Reconciling Supply of and Demand for Science. (Draft)

 

Sarewitz, D. & Pielke Jr., R.A.  (2005, January 17).  Rising Tide: The Tsunami’s Real Cause. The New Republic.

 

Pirtle, Zach
return to top

 

Pirtle, Z.  (2006, February 24).  Ways of Arguing with Intelligent Design: Philosophers on Demarcation.  School of Life Sciences' 13th Annual Undergraduate Research Poster Symposium, Arizona State University, Tempe.

 

Porter, Alan
return to top

Garfinkel, M.S., Sarewitz, D. & Porter, A.L.   (2006, March).  A Societal Outcomes Map for Health Research and Policy.  American Journal of Public Health, 96(3), 441-446.

 

Privateer, Paul

return to top

 

Privateer, Paul.  (2005/2006).  Postmodernism and Replication Technologies: A Theory of the Mechanics of Culture.  International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society, 1. 

 

Privateer, Paul.  (2006).  Inventing Intelligence: A Social History of Smart.  Blackwell Publishing.

Sarewitz, Daniel
return to top
 

Sarewitz, D.  (1996).  Frontiers of Illusion: Science, Technology, and the Politics of Progress.  Philadelphia: University Temple Press.

 

Sarewitz, D. (1997). Social Change and Science Policy. Issues in Science and Technology Online, Retrieved  from http://www.issues.org/13.4/sarewi.htm.

 

Sarewitz, D.  (2000).  Human Well-being and Federal Science: What’s the connection?  Science, Technology, and Democracy, 87-102.

 

Sarewitz, D.  (2000, August 20-25).  Science Policy Present: Where is the Frontier? Gordon Research Conference: New Frontiers in Science and Technology Policy, Plymouth, NH.

 

Crow, M.M. & Sarewitz, D.  (2001). Nanotechnology and Societal Transformation.  In A.H. Teich, et al., AAAS Science and Technology Policy Yearbook 2001 (pp. 89-101).  Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

 

Bozeman B., & Sarewitz D. (2002, October 18). Public Failures in U.S. Science Policy. (Draft)

 

Guston, D. & Sarewitz, D. (2002). Real-Time Technology Assessment. Technology in Society, 24(1-2), 93-109.

 

Lightman, A., Sarewitz, D. and Desser, C (Eds.).  (2003).  Living with the Genie: Essays on Technology and the Quest for Human Mastery.  Washington, DC: Island Press.

 

Sarewitz, D.  (2004, September).  Fundamentals and Fundamentalists.  CSPO Perspectives.

 

Sarewitz, D.  (2005, December).  Where Responsibility Lies.  CSPO Perspective.

 

Sarewitz, D. & Pielke Jr., R.A. (2005). The Neglected Heart of Science Policy: Reconciling Supply of and Demand for Science. (Draft)

 

Sarewitz, D. & Pielke Jr., R.A.  (2005, January 17).  Rising Tide: The Tsunami’s Real Cause. The New Republic.

 

Garfinkel, M.S., Sarewitz, D. & Porter, A.L.   (2006, March).  A Societal Outcomes Map for Health Research and Policy.  American Journal of Public Health, 96(3), 441-446.

 

Sarewitz, D.  (2006).  Public Science and Social Responsibilities. Development, 2006, 00, (1-5).  Society for International Development. 

 

Wetmore, Jameson M.

return to top

 

Wetmore, J.  (2005, October).  Building Amish Community:  Values, Boundaries, and Technological Choice.  Society for the Social Studies of Science Conference, Pasadena, CA.

 

Wetmore, J.M.  (2006).  Distributing Risks and Responsibilities: Flood Hazard Mitigation in New Orleans.  Submitted to Social Studies of Science for its upcoming special issue: "Things Fall Apart: Comments on Hurricane Katrina."

 

Wetmore, J.M. (2007). Amish Technology: Reinforcing Values and Building Community. IEEE Technology & Society Magazine 26(2): 10-21.

 

Wolbring, Gregor

return to top

 

Theme C Panel. (2002).  Improving Human Health and Physical Capabilities Theme C Summary.  In Roco, M.C. and Bainbridge, W.S. Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science (pp. 179-183).  Arlington, Virginia: NSF/DOC - sponsored report. 

 

Wolbring, G. (2002).  Improving Quality of Life of Disabled People Using Converging Technologies.  In Roco, M.C. and Bainbridge, W.S. Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science (pp. 270-273).  Arlington, Virginia: NSF/DOC - sponsored report. 

 

Wolbring, G. (2002).  Science and Technology and the Triple D (Disease, Disability, Defect).  In Roco, M.C. and Bainbridge, W.S. Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science (pp. 232-243).  Arlington, Virginia: NSF/DOC - sponsored report. 

 

Wolbring, G. (2004).  Solutions follow perception: NBIC and the concept of health, medicine, disability and disease. Alberta Health Law Review, 12(3).

 

Wolbring, G.  (2006).  The Enhancement Debate: Able-ism Leads to Transhumanism.  James Martin Institute World Forum on Science and Civilization: "Tomorrow's People: The challenges of technologies for life extension and enhancement," University of Oxford.