Science, Technology and Public Affairs


Class 2 – January 26:  Historical Roots

McNeill, William H., The Pursuit of Power (Chicago:  University of Chicago Press), 1982. Chapter 7, "The Initial Industrialization of War," pp. 223-261.
Read more

 

Rosenberg, Charles, No Other Gods:  On Science and American Social Thought (Baltimore:  Johns Hopkins University Press) 1976 (orig. pub'd 1961).  Chapter 8, "Science and Social Values in Nineteenth-Century America:  A Case Study in the Growth of Scientific Institutions," pp. 135-152.
Read more

 


Class 3 – February 2:  Policy Foundations and Political History

Ehlers, Vern, Unlocking Our Future:  Toward a New National Science Policy, 1998, at: http://www.house.gov/science/science_policy_report.htm.
Read more

 

Brooks, Harvey, The Evolution of U.S. Science Policy, in B. Smith and C. Barfield (eds.), Technology, R&D, and the Economy, Washington, DC:  Brookings Institution, 1995, p. 15-47.
Read more


Class 4 – February 9:  Philosophies of Science Policy


Guston, David H., Retiring the Social Contract for Science, Issues in Science and Technology, Summer 2000, at: http://www.nap.edu/issues/16.4/p_guston.htm.
Read more
 


Class 7 – March 2:  Technology policy

Clinton, William J. and Albert Gore, Jr., Technology for America's Economic Growth, A New Direction to Build Economic Strength, 36 p. February 22, 1993, http://simr02.si.ehu.es/DOCS/nearnet.gnn.com/mag/10_93/articles/clinton/clinton.tech.html.
Read more
 


Class 10 – March 30:  Science, Technology, and Development
 

Acemodlu, D., S. Johnson, and J. Robinson, The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development:  An Empirical Investigation, American Economic Review 91(5):  1369-1401, 2001, @ http://www.tau.ac.il/~reshefar/eco_a/Acemoglu.pdf.
Read more

Dahlman, Carl J. and Richard Nelson. "Social Absorption Capability,  National Innovation Systems and Economic Development." Social capability and long term economic growth. Eds. Bon-Ho Koo and Dwight Perkins (eds). New York: St. Martin's Press; London: Macmillan Press, 1995. 82-122.
Read more
 


Class 11 – April 6:  Issues in Science and Technology Policy:  The GM Food Debate

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, Text of the Protocol: Article 11. Procedure for Living Modified Organisms Intended for Direct Use as Food or Feed, or for Processing.  http://www.biodiv.org/biosafety/articles.asp?1g=0&a=bsp-11.
Read more


Class 12 – April 13:  Issues in Science and Technology Policy:  Intellectual Property

 

US Dept. of Agriculture, Why USDA’s Technology Protection System (aka “Terminator”) Benefits Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service News and Information, December 2001, at: http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/br/tps/.
Read more

 

Rural Advancement Foundation International, Terminator Two Years Later, Communique, Feb. 25, 2000, at:  http://www.etcgroup.org/documents/com_suicideseeds.pdf.
Read more

Drahos, Peter and John Braithwaite, Who Owns the Knowledge Economy? Political Organising Behind TRIPS.  Corner House Briefing Paper 32, 2004.
http://www.thecornerhouse.org.uk/item.shtml?x=85821.
Read more

 




Privacy Policy . Copyright 2004 . Arizona State University
Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes
College of Liberal Arts and Sciences
PO Box 874401, Tempe AZ 85287-4401, Phone: 480-727-8787, Fax: 480-727-8791
cspo@asu.edu