The House of Representatives has
passed a massive climate change bill aimed at legislating a new,
climate-friendly energy supply into existence through emissions caps,
technology standards, and incentives. The bill’s champions assume that, in
response to an array of mandated carrots and sticks, nimble startup firms will
be motivated to develop new clean-energy technologies that will ultimately
revolutionize our use of energy, while investors smelling early profits will line
up to fund these activities.
Unfortunately,
a crucial question remains embarrassingly unasked: Who is going to buy enough
of these new technologies to establish a market that's large enough to meet our
carbon reduction goals? This question is
particularly vexing because, in the energy sector, existing business models are
deeply entrenched, huge capital investments are at stake, and new technologies
often require changes in consumer behavior that inhibit adoption.
Large, reliable, early-adopter customers
are essential to new markets—to bring in revenue that helps scale up
operations, and to foster confidence that attracts more customers and new
investments. Real-world customer feedback also promotes rapid innovation and
improves the chances that new products will succeed in the market.
What would
the ideal clean-energy customer look like? Imagine an organization big enough
to have energy systems that mirror the real world’s, rich enough that its
purchasing power could command the attention of innovators, sophisticated
enough to assess and deploy the latest technologies, and disciplined enough to
push those new technologies relentlessly in the direction of greater efficiency
and lower cost, year after year.
Something
akin to this ideal customer exists: The Department of Defense, funded annually
at about $500 billion (roughly the GDP of Sweden). DoD owns a huge
infrastructure, including 570,000 buildings at more than 5,000 facilities and
bases (many of which are the equivalent of small cities), hundreds of thousands
of vehicles and tens of thousands of aircraft, and annual energy costs of about
$20 billion.
For more
than 60 years, DoD has been by far the world’s most important customer for
driving high-tech innovation. In
aviation, telecommunications, advanced materials, semiconductors, and many
other fields, the dual role of DoD as investor and major customer has
stimulated rapid technological improvements, allowed scale-up of high-tech
systems so they became both practical and affordable, and catalyzed the growth
of the private sector so technologies could flourish in the broader
marketplace. The Internet may be the
DoD's crowning achievement. First
conceived at DoD’s Advanced Projects Agency, this early computer network
eventually created a market for equipment and service providers that soon
spilled over into the private sector as the Internet, an unparalleled platform
for innovation and wealth creation.
Yet
policymakers have, amazingly, ignored the critical role of government as a
strategic customer for energy technology. DoD, with its hunger for energy, huge
size, and sophisticated technical capabilities and needs, could quickly become
the world’s most important consumer and catalyst for clean energy
innovation—even as it vastly improves its operational efficiency and
flexibility in providing for the nation’s defense. We can see the latent capacity for this role
in the early adoption of solar energy cells by the military for use on
satellites (in the 1950s!); in the ever-increasing demand for better batteries
to support troops in remote locations; in the nation’s largest solar energy
farm on Nellis Air Force Base in Nevada.
Congress or
the President should ask the Department of Defense to develop a plan for
committing to a path of progressively increasing efficiency and clean energy
across all aspects of its operations, from tanks in the desert to the
supermarkets on its bases. This plan
should include a DoD commitment to purchase prescribed amounts of increasingly
efficient clean energy capability in 2015-2030 time period. Such a commitment would send an immediate,
strong economic signal to innovators and investors, and would decisively put
the nation, and the world, on a path to a clean energy future.
About the Authors: David Douglas is the chief
sustainability officer at Sun Microsystems. Daniel
Sarewitz is the co-director of CSPO.


The government also likely funded the projects which led to the technology in the first place; and isn't the purpose of funding energy projects to eventually get them to market? I tried to explain this concept and the ideas you've presented here in my energy policy letter to Congress. It is possible they will ignore energy until prices skyrocket again. Congress isn't a proactive group.
Once the Duke Energy%u2019s Edwardsport IGCC plant in Indiana is completed (it%u2019s on schedule for 2012), this IGCC plant will be one of the cleanest coal-based power plants in the world, producing 10 times as much power as the existing unit with 45 percent less carbon dioxide emissions per unit of energy produced. http://sn.im/factuality5