Soapbox Post

Over the past few months, policy failures in health care reform and climate change have stunned the world. Perhaps we shouldn’t have been so surprised. At the heart of both problems are “policy thickets” that must be untangled before significant progress can be expected. What do I mean?

 

A policy thicket can be analogized to a patent thicket. Patent thickets occur when so many patents overlap in a particular domain of innovation that no single company can successfully navigate the thicket with relevant licenses to legally bring a new product to market.

 

Policy thickets can be defined as occurring when complex, large-scale technological systems cut across so many legal, administrative, political, or social jurisdictions that it becomes impossible to effectively resolve who has jurisdiction over their governance, let alone to adjudicate conflicts among multiple claimants.

 

When policy thickets occur, problems can take many forms. Lapses can occur in governance simply because no one knows where proper authority lies. By some accounts, this played a major role in the failure of oversight over the adequacy of the New Orleans levies pre-Katrina. Irresolvable political conflict can also occur when overlapping jurisdictional claims impede coherent policy development and the ability to resolve fundamental value differences.

 

Arguably, U.S. infrastructure policy suffers from a plethora of policy thickets, both in health care and energy, as well as in many other fields. Siting a single renewable energy facility requires approval from dozens of local, county, state, and federal agencies, as well as private utilities. Under such circumstances, the possibility of imagining coherent energy planning for even a single municipality, let alone a state or country becomes impossible. Absent an untangling of the policy thicket, ad hoc, small-scale changes are possible (but hardly socially, politically, or economically efficient), but large-scale reform is not.

 

Policy thickets are the accretion of over a century of the simultaneous construction of technological systems and political authority over them. Undoing them will be a constitutional challenge of the first order, albeit a critical one. We’re rapidly moving from the era of technological construction to the era of technological reconstruction. That reconstruction will be more manageable if we open our eyes to and fix our attention upon the problem of policy thickets in the complex intertwining of human relationships and technological infrastructures.

 

 

About the Author:  Clark Miller is associate director of CSPO and associate professor of science policy and political science.

Comments
Sorry! Comments have been automatically turned off for this post. Comments are automatically turned off 360 days after being published.
 


Privacy Policy . Copyright 2013 . Arizona State University
Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes
College of Liberal Arts and Sciences
PO Box 875603, Tempe AZ 85287-5603, Phone: 480-727-8787, Fax: 480-727-8791
cspo@asu.edu